MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS
(Department of Personnel and Training)
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 30th September, 2014
G.S.R. 707(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 and clause (5) of article 148 of the Constitution and after consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India in relation to the persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, the President hereby;makes the following rules further to amend the Residents of the State of Jammu and Kashmir (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit for Recruitment to Central Civil Services and posts) Rules, 1997, namely:-
1, (I) These rules may be called the Residents of the State of Jammu and Kashmir (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit for Recruitment to Central Civil Services and posts) Amendment Rules, 2014.
(2) They shall be deemed to have come into force with effect from the I n day of January, 2014.
2. In the Residents of the State of Jammu and Kashmir (Relaxation of Upper Age Limit for Recruitment to Central Civil Services and posts) Rules, 1997, in rule 1, in sub-rule(3), for the figures “2013”, the figures “2015” shall be substituted.
[F.No.15012/1/2014-Estt(D)]
MAMTA KUNDRA, Jt. Secy.
Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide notification number G.S.R. 208(E)
dated the 10th April, 1997 and subsequently amended vide:-
1. G.S.R. 826(E) dated the 27th December, 1999;
2. G.S.R. 919(E) dated the 22nd December, 2001;
3. G.S.R. 879(E) dated the 10th November, 2003;
4. G.S.R. 707(E) dated the 6th December, 2005;
5. G.S.R. 761 (E) dated the 7th December, 2007;
6. G.S.R. 839 (E) dated the 23rd November, 2009; and
7. G.S.R. 915(E) dated the 30th December, 2011.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Central Government has decided to extend the age relaxation to all persons who had ordinarily been domiciled
in the State of Jammu and Kashmir during the period from the 1st day of January, 1980 to the 31st day of December,
1989 for a further period of two years beyond 31st December, 2013.
2. It is clarified that nobody’s interest will be adversely affected by the retrospective effect being given to the rules.