OROP Revised Table No 23
OROP revised tables of EC/SSC officer (other than medical officers). Refer One Rank One Pension to the Defence Force Personnel Corrigendum Tables – DESW ORDER
OROP Revised Table No 14
OROP Revised Table 14
OROP revised tables of EC/SSC officer (other than medical officers). Refer One Rank One Pension to the Defence Force Personnel Corrigendum Tables – DESW ORDER
OROP Revised Table 5
OROP Revised Table 5
OROP revised tables of EC/SSC officer (other than medical officers). Refer One Rank One Pension to the Defence Force Personnel Corrigendum Tables – DESW ORDER
Problems faced by GDS BPMS while operating the RICT machines
Problems faced by GDS BPMS while operating the RICT machines
Letter No. GDS/CHQ/84/5/2018
Dated:17.10.2018
To,
Shri A.N Nanda jee,
Secretary,
Department of Posts,
Dak Bhavan,
New Delhi – 1
Sir,
Sub: Problems faced by GDS BPMS while operating the RICT machines-Reg
The department of posts introduced RICT and DARPAN in Branch post offices. The GDS BPMs have to perform all kinds of transactions on RICT machine including B.O. Daily Account. Implementation of RICT must be after complete success of the scheme. Lots of problems are being faced by the staff, mainly because of network issues. At least in future all precautions should be taken before implementation of the said schemes. The GDS BPMs are facing following Problems.
(i) Proper signals are not available during working hours. Due to network problem they are waiting for hours to open the device.
(ii) The device went back to login for every two minutes.
After completion of one transaction, the GDS BPM has to login to continue the work. Due to this type of arrangement, GDS has to spend more time to complete the B.O. task.
You are requested to take appropriate steps to reduce the difficulties mentioned above.
This union also suggests that it is better to provide computers and printers to Branch offices in place of hand devices to work efficiently without interruption.
With regards
Yours Faithfully
(S.S.Mahadevaiah)
General Secretary
Source : https://ruralpostalemployees.blogspot.com/
Wage Revision Talks with IBA – Bipartite Settlement
Wage Revision Talks with IBA – Bipartite Settlement
CIRCULAR No. UFBU/2018/18
Date : 12-10-2018
TO ALL CONSTITUENT UNIONS/MEMBERS
Dear Comrades,
WAGE REVISION TALKS WITH IBA
Another round of Bipartite Talks took place between IBA and UFBU today at Mumbai on our demands for wage revision. IBA team was led by Shri R.K. Takkar, MD/CEO of UCO Bank and Chairman of the Negotiating Committee. UFBU was represented by our 9 constituent Unions.
Continuing the discussions held in the last round of meeting held on 29-9-2018, IBA wanted our response to their proposal given in the last meeting to decide wage revision Bank-wise based on capacity to pay to be determined through a formula based on Operating Profits and Return on Assets of each Bank every year.
In reply, from UFBU we stated that while varying performance of the banks can be a basis for formulating incentives to be paid to the Employees and Officers in each Bank, it can be a separate issue exclusive of wage revision exercise.
From our side, we reiterated and emphasized the following standpoints of UFBU:
1. IBA’s earlier offer of 6% should be substantially improved upon to work out a mutually acceptable wage accord.
2. IBA’s proposal of linking wage revision to Bank-wise Operating Profits and Return on Assets of individual Banks and thus breaking the existing system of equal wage for equal work is not acceptable to UFBU.
3. Issue of restricted mandate given by SBI, BOB, PNB, Union Bank of India and Indian Bank should be reviewed and resolved to cover all scales of Officers.
From IBA they repeatedly argued, advocated and pleaded to accept the formula of Bank-wise wage revision according to capacity to pay based on operating profits and further stated that their proposed formula can be modified or amended by further discussions but persisted with their stand that wage revision needs to be based on capacity of the different banks. For this purpose they wanted the suggestions from the UFBU.
We replied that uniform wages in the banking sector has evolved over decades starting from 1948 (Sen Award) and wage revision has never been a major problem in any of the Banks so far even whey had passed through turbulent times. We also pointed out that wage cost as a ratio to total operating expenses of the Banks has actually declined in the recent years and hence IBA’s proposals are not acceptable.
We have requested the IBA to revisit their proposition and come forward to hike their offer from 6% to adequate level and payable uniformly to all banks. We have given our mind to IBA that if the wage revision would linger on in this way by insisting on Bank-wise wage revision based on individual Banks’ operating profits, it would lead to confrontation and consequent agitation by the Employees and Officers. IBA agreed to discuss the issue further in the next round of discussions and requested the unions to have an open mind on their proposal.
Comrades, it appears that there are attempts on the part of the Bankers and Government to reverse the clock by foisting Bank-wise wage revision and divide the workforce to weaken our unity and fraternity. Our demand for a reasonable and decent wage revision is based on inflation, cost of living and also the present level of work pressure and job profile of Bank Employees and Officers and hence cannot be compromised. While we are dealing with the issue with utmost patience and restraint to find an amicable solution to our demands, our unions and members should get ready to an eventual conflict on this issue if they prefer to precipitate the problem and not come forward to resolve our demands expeditiously and amicably.
We will keep our members informed of further developments in due course. In the meantime, our members are cautioned not be misled and carried away by various provocative messages that are deliberately put up in the social media by inimical forces.
With greetings,
Yours Comradely,
(SANJEEV K. BANDLISH)
CONVENOR
Promotion of Graduate Clerks-cum-Typists & Graduate MTS on passing Departmental Examination held on 20th August, 2018.
Promotion of Graduate Clerks-cum-Typists & Graduate MTS on passing Departmental Examination held on 20th August, 2018.
Controller General of Defence Accounts
Ulan Batar Road, Palam, Delhi Cantt-110010
No. AN/XI/11154/2017/MTS, Clk(Graduate)
Date 17.10.2018
To,
All PCsDA/PCA(Fys)/CsDA.
(Through CGDA Website)
Subject : Promotion of Graduate Clerks-cum-Typists & Graduate MTS on passing Departmental Examination held on 20th August, 2018.
Result of the Departmental Examination for promotion of Graduate Clerks-cum-Typists & Graduate MTS to the grade of Auditor held on 20th August, 2018 has been declared and circulated to all PCsDS/CsDA vide this HQrs office Circular No. AN/SAS/16501/GC&GMTS-AUD/AUG/2018/Result dated 5th September, 2018.
2. As such, PCsDS/CsDA are requested to convene a DPC to consider promotion to the grade of Auditor and furnish adjudication Report along with DPC proceedings in the proforma as per Annexure ‘A’ (For Graduate Clerks) and Annexure ‘B'(For Graduate MTS) enclosed in respect of those candidates, who have passed the examination, on the basis of APARs for the year 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 201445 and 2015-16 so as to reach this HQrs Office latest by 31-10-2018. It may also be ensured that no eligible individual falling within the zone of consideration has been left for adjudication. The requisite information in MS Excel format and scanned copy of DPC proceedings may also compulsorily be uploaded on CGDA mail server through Zimbra ID: [email protected] and Admin XI (Section) mail ID [email protected] . It may also be ensured that the format of Excel sheet is not tampered with, no columns are left blank and the dates mentioned in the data are as per “DD-MM-YYYY” format.
3. While adjudication the cases the criteria laid down in our circular letter No. AN/XI/11060/I/IV dated 18-09-1989 may be kept in view.
4. Nil report is also required. Please ensure submission of DPC by the due date.
Encl. Annexure ‘A’ & ‘B’
(Mustaq Ahmad)
Dy. CGDA
Option to be submitted by ESIC Medical Officers (Teaching & Non Teaching) upto 65 Years
Option to be submitted by ESIC Medical Officers (Teaching & Non Teaching) upto 65 Years
HEADQUARTERS OFFICE
EMPLOYEES’ STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
(ISO 9001-2008 CERTIFIED)
PANCHDEEP BHAWAN, C.I.G. MARG, NEW DELHI-110002
No : A-40/11/13/1/2016-Med.VI
Dated: 17-10-2018
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT : FUNDAMENTAL (SECOND AMENDMENT) RULES, 2018 – OPTION TO BE SUBMITTED BY ESIC MEDICAL OFFICERS (TEACHING & NON TEACHING) UPTO 65 YEARS-REGARDING.
The undersigned is directed to forward herewith Department of Personnel and Training’s notification No. GSR 767 (E) published in the Gazette of India dated 11.08.2018 vide which the age of superannuation in respect of the doctors belonging to Central Government shall be 62 years unless they exercise the option of posting to teaching, clinical or patient care. The notification being an amendment in Fundamental Rules (FR), by virtue of Section 17(2) of ESIC Act 1948, is applicable to the Medical Officers working in ESIC as well.
2. Accordingly, options in the prescribed format may be submitted by the serving Doctors of ESI Corporation (teaching & non-teaching) who have already attained the age of 62 years or are attaining the age of 62 years within a period of 30 days from the date of issue of this communication, for their continuation in service in teaching / clinical / patient care etc if they desire to continue upto the age of 65 years.
3. The serving doctors belonging to teaching & non-teaching cadres, who fail to exercise this option with regard to their continuation in service upto 65 years as mentioned in Para 2 above shall stand superannuated from their service on attaining the age of 62 years or on expiry of 30 days, as the case may be, from the date of issue of this communication, whichever is later.
4. As this will be an ongoing process, the heads of ESIC hospitals / Institutions shall send the “Option’, to be submitted by the concerned doctors in the prescribed format, atleast six months prior to Deputy Director (Medical Administration-VI), ESI Corporation, Panchdeep Bhawan, CIG Road, New Delhi-110 002.
5. These instructions may be brought to the notice of all concerned under acknowledgment.
Ends: As above.
(Bhupender Kumar)
Deputy Director
Signed Copy & Option Format – Download here
OROP Revised Tables for Defence Force Personnel: DESW Order 17 October 2018
OROP Revised Tables: One Rank One Pension to the Defence Force Personnel Corrigendum Tables Dated 17.10.2018
No. 12(1)/2014/D(Pen/Policy)/Pt.II
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare
New Delhi, 17th October, 2018
To
The Chief of the Army Staff
The Chief of the Naval Staff
The Chief of the Air Staff
Sub: One Rank One Pension to the Defence Force Personnel.
Sir,
The undersigned is directed to refer to this Ministry’s letter No. 12(1)/2014/D(Pen/Policy)-Part-II dated 03.02.2016,. appending 101 pension tables indicating rates of pension/family pension under OROP scheme notified vide this Ministry’s letter No. 12(1)/2014/D(Pen/Po1)-Part-II dated 07.11.2015.
2. As per Para-3 of GoI, MoD letter No. 12(1)/2014/D(Pen/Pol)-Part-II dated 07.11.2015, OROP tables had been prepared on the basis of the average of minimum and maximum pension of personnel retired in 2013 in the same rank and with same length of service. However, in preparing the tables of EC/SSC officer (other than medical officers) data of pension of Cdr, (Lt. Col. in Army) was inadvertently taken as pension of Lt. Cdr. (Major in Army). This has affected tables No. 5, 14, 23, 32, 41, 50, 63, 64, 74, 83 and 92. The modified tables are enclosed herewith. Pension of the affected pensioners may be revised according to amended tables. However, if pension revised in these cases according to amended tables w.e.f, 1.7.2014 is less than the pension as on 30.06.2014, the same will not be revised to the disadvantage to the pensioner.
3. Further, in table No. 7, the pension rate of Hony, Nb. Subedar with qualifying service of 13 years has not been protected with reference to the lower rank viz. Havildar of same qualifying service i.e. 13 years. As such following amendment may be carried out in table No. 7 :
| Rank | – | Hony. Nb. Sub. |
| Group | – | X |
| Qualifying Service | – | 13 Years |
| For | – | 8078 |
| Read | – | 8136 |
4. Any arrears/recovery of overpayment pension would have to be adjusted by the concerned PDAs as per the extant rules/procedure.
5. All the terms and conditions which are not affected by this order shall remain unchanged.
6. This issue with the concurrence of Finance Division of this Ministry vide their ID No. PC.I. to 10(11)/2012/Fin/Pen dated 14.08.2018.
7. Hindi version will follow.
Yours faithfully,
(Manoj Sinha)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
7th CPC LTC NER, JK, AN and Lakshadweep – Emergency Passage Concession
7th CPC LTC NER, JK, AN and Lakshadweep – Emergency Passage Concession
F.No.31011/12/2015-Estt.A-IV
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
Establishment A-IV Desk
North Block New Delhi,
Dated April 24,2018
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject : LTC facilities to the Civilian employees of the Central Government serving in States of the North-Eastern Region, Ladakh region of State of Jammu & Kashmir and in Union Territories of Andaman & Nicobar Island and Lakshadweep Group of Islands — Implementation of recommendations of 7th CPC.
The undersigned is directed to refer to Department of Expenditure’s No.11(2)/97-E.II(B) dated 22nd July, 1998, regarding Allowance & Special Facilities for civilian employees of the Central Government serving in States and Union Territories of the North-Eastern Region and in the Andaman & Nicobar Island and Lakshadweep Group of Islands.
2. The aforesaid O.M.provided the option of availing every year Home Town LTC (for self and family) to a Government servant serving in North-Eastern Region, Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep groups of Islands who leaves his farmy behind at old headquarters or another selected place of residence, and who has not availed of transfer traveling allowance far family. In addition, two additional passages undef “Emergency Passage Concession” is also provided to the employees posted in these regions to enable them and/or their families [spouse and two dependent children to travel either to the Home Town or the station of posting in an emergency.
3. The Seventh Pay Commission has recommended that splitting of hometown LTC should allowed in case of employees posted in North East, Ladakh and Island territories of Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshadweap. This will enable these employees and their families to meet more often.
4. Consequent upon acceptance of recommendations of Seventh Pay Commission, it has been decided that a civilian Central Government servant serving in North-Eastern Region, Ladakh region of State of Jammu & Kashmir, Andaman & Nicobar Islands and Lakshadweep groups of Islands, who leaves his family behind at ttp old headquarters or another selected place of residence and has not availed of transfer travelling allowance for family, shall be provided with the following options for the purpose of LTC:
(i) The Government servant may avail LTC for joumey ta the Home Town once in a block period of two years andlor one ‘Anywhere in India’ LTC in a block af four years under the normal LTC rules.
(ii) In lieu thereof, the Government servant may avail the facility for himself/herself to travel once a year from the station of posting to the Horne Town or the place where the family is residing and for family [restricted only to the spouse and dependent children as per the ‘family’ definition of CCS(LTC), Rules, 19881 to travel once a year to visit the Government servant at the station of posting.
5. In addition, Central Government employees and their families posted in these territories shall be entitled to avail of the Leave Travel Concession, In emergencies, on two additional occasions during their entire service Career. This shall be termed as “Emergency Passage Concession” and is intended to enable the Central Government employees and/or their families (restricted only to spouse and dependent children) to travel either to the Horne Town or the station of posting ir an emergency The two additional passages under the Emergency Passage Concession shall be availed by the entitled mode and class of travel as admissible under the normal Leave Travel Concession Rules.
6. This O.M. will take effect from July 1, 2017.
7.Hindi version will follow.
sd/-
(Sanjiv Kumar)
Deputy Secretary to the Government at India
Travel entitlements of Govt employees for the purpose of LTC post 7th CPC
Travel entitlements of Govt employees for the purpose of LTC post 7th CPC
No. 31011/8/2017 – Estt.A-IV
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training
Establishment A-IV Desk
***
North Block New Delhi.
Dated October 18, 2018
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject : Travel entitlements of Government employees for the purpose of LTC post Seventh Central Pay Commission – clarification reg.
The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s O.M.of even no. dated 19.09.2017 on the subject noted above, which inter-alia provides that the travel entitlements of Government servants for the purpose of LTC shall be the same as TA entitlements as notified vide Ministry of Finance’s O.M. No. 19030/1/2017-E.IV dated 13.07.2017, except the air travel entitlement for Level 6 to Level 8 of the Pay Matrix, which is allowed in respect of TA only and not for LTC.
2. It is observed that many Government employees in Level 6 to Level 8 of the Pay Matrix had inadvertently travelled by air on LTC during the intervening period from 13.07.2017 to 19.09.2017 (i.e. post issue of MoF’s O.M. dated 13.07.2017 and before the issue of DoPT’s O.M. dated 19.09.2017) under the impression that they were entitled for air travel as per the revised TA rules. This Department is in receipt of references from the Government employees and various Ministries/Departments seeking relaxation in respect of such Government employees in view of the hardships faced by them in settlement of their LTC claims.
3. The matter has been examined in this Department in consultation with Department of Expenditure. In relaxation to this Department’s O.M. of even no. dated 19.09.2017, it has been decided to allow the claims of the Government employees in Level 6 to Level 8 of the Pay Matrix, who had travelled by air as per the revised TA rules while availing LTC during 13.07.2017 to 19.09.2017. This shall be subject to the fulfillment of other conditions of air travel on LTC such as booking of air tickets through the authorised modes, fare limit of LTC80, etc.
4. Hindi version will follow.
(Surya Narayan Jha)
Under Secretary to the Government of India