Home Blog Page 740

State Government responses on the Discontinuation of Interview – DOPT

State Government responses on the Discontinuation of Interview – DOPT

Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievance and Pensions
(Department of Personnel and Training)
Estt. B Section

Discontinuation of Interview at Lower Level Posts

The Prime Minister in his address to the nation on the Independence Day has stressed the need to discontinue holding interviews for recruitment for such junior level posts where personality assessment is not an absolutely necessary requirement.

He has called upon the Government Organizations’ to end this practice at the earliest as it will help in curbing corruption, more objective selection in transparent manner substantially easing the problems of poor people.

He has emphasized that the recruitment should be made on merit basis through transparent, online processes leading to less Government and more Governance.

The Department of Personnel and Training on the basis of recommendations made by the Committee of Secretaries has already taken a decision to discontinue interviews at the junior level posts at Group ‘B’ (Non-Gazetted), Group ‘C’ ,Group ‘D’ (which are now reclassified as Group ‘C’) and all equivalent posts.

All the advertisement for future vacancies will be without the Interview as part of the recruitment process. From 1st January 2016 there will be no recruitment with interview at the junior level posts, in Government of India Ministries/Departments/attached Office/Subordinate Office/Autonomous Bodies/Public Sector Undertakings.

The interviews will be done away even in cases where the selections were made purely on basis of performance in the interview. The Ministries/Departments/Organizations’ will consider revising the scheme for selection for such cases.

As the Skill Test or Physical Test is different from Interview they may continue. However these tests will only be of qualifying nature. Assessment will not be done on the basis of marks for such tests.
The decision to discontinue interview for the junior level posts across the country will be major step towards achieving the objectives of citizen centric transparent governance.

The matter has also been taken up with the State Governments/UTs to undertake similar exercise, from time to time. In this regard letters from Secretary (Personnel) to the State Chief Secretaries have been issued on 4th September 2015 and letters from MoS(PP) to the State Chief Ministers have been issued on 29th September 2015 and 1st January 2015.

To facilitate the implementation of the directions of the Hon’ble Prime Minister further by the various Organizations/Ministries/Departments/Governments a one day workshop was also organized by the DOPT on 16th November 2015.

Some of the State Government have shared the status in this regard with the DOPT. The Summary of the State Responses on the Discontinuation of Interview is as follows:

Manipur It was informed that the State Government had undertaken the recruitment of Graduate Teachers under the Rashtriya Madhyamik Siksha Abhiyaan (RMSA) without conducting interview. This measure was successfully undertaken and was completely transparent and corruption free.

It was informed that the second pilot measure in this regard is being undertaken by the Health Department.

Punjab Some of the Departments have already implemented the decision and that there has been no problem with completely doing away with interviews for the posts of SDO in Irrigation Department, Senior Assistant in Secretariat and for a few lower level posts in Agro Industry Department.
Rajasthan The representative from Rajasthan informed that interviews have been discontinued in some posts and retained in some of them.

For Class 3/Ministerial staff and Group D/Class 4 level recruitment, there have been no interview. Similarly for Constable, there have been only written test and physical test. The interviews have been dispensed away for all the posts under the Rajasthan Education Service Rules,1970.

Maharashtra Interviews for the recruitment of the clerks have been discontinued. For Class 2 non-Gazetted, Class 3 and 4 posts, interviews have been done away .The State Government has taken a decision and issued directions to the effect that the decision of discontinuation of Interview will also be applicable to all State Government undertakings and local bodies. About 61% of the recruitment is done without Interview.
Uttarakhand The state Government has abolished interviews in the group ‘C’ and `B (non gazetted).
There has been no interview in Class 3/4 levels of posts.
Jharkhand No interview in ‘D’, ‘C’, and ‘B’ (non-gazetted)
Kerala At present no interview are there for group ‘C’ and ‘D’ posts and even for some of the gazetted posts.
Sikkim For Group D/Class 4 level posts there are no interviews. At Group C/III level, for 90% of posts there are no interviews.
Himachal Pradesh There is a proposal to discontinue interview for Group C and Group B Posts
Haryana No interviews at Group ‘D’ level
Tamil Nadu The recruitment is done by the following four recruitment boards and the status vis-à-vis conducting the interview is as follows:-
1)     Uniform Services Board- No interview
2)     Medical Services Board- No interview
3)     Teachers Recruitment Board —No interview
4)     Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (TNPSC) — has assorted
posts in which there is some degree of posts with interviews.
In the State 85% of the total posts do not have interview as a part of recruitment process.
Telangana Teachers — no interviews
Uttar Pradesh No more interview for teachers.
Puducherry Notification for discontinuation of interviews for Groups C, D, and non­gazetted Group B has been issued.
Daman & Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli No interviews in Group B (non gazetted), C and D posts. They have issued a recruitment pattern.

Disclaimer: The above status is based on the information provided by the State/UT representatives’ in the workshop held in New Delhi on 16.11.2015.

Original Copy

File the property returns in paper format – DOPT ORDER

File the property returns in paper format – DOPT

No. 25/1/2015-CS-II(C)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions,
Department of Personnel & Training
*******

3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi,
Dated: 28th January, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Immovable Property Return for the year 2015 (as on 31.12.2015).

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM of even number dated 18.01.2016 on the above mentioned subject and to say that It has come to notice of this Department that a large numbers of officers of CSSS & CSCS are not being able/ or finding it difficult to access the system online due to heavy load on the server with closing date nearing. As the system is web based, officers may try filing IPR beyond office hours when the system is less congested. If it is still not possible to file the return online for any reason by the due date, they should file the return in paper format to their offices by the stipulated date i.e. 31.01.2016 & subsequently file the same through cscros.nic.in, as per procedure.

(Kameshwar Mishra)
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Original Copy

Clarification on date of priority for allotment of GPRA for Casual labourers

Clarification on date of priority for allotment of General Pool Residential Accommodation to the employees granted temporary status under “Casual labourers

No.12035/20/94-PoI.II(Vol.II)
Government of India
Ministry of Urban Development
Directorate of Estates

Nirman Bhavan,
New Delhi-110 108.

Dated the 19th January, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Clarification on date of priority for allotment of General Pool Residential Accommodation to the employees granted temporary status under “Casual labourers(Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme of Government of India. 1993?.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Directorate’s O.M. No. 12035/20/94-Pol.II(Pt.1) dated 27.8.2009 vide which allotment of GPRA was allowed to such temporary status employees who:

i.are working in eligible offices and have been awarded temporary status under the provisions of the Scheme called “Casual labourers(Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme of Government of India, 1993”;

ii. have rendered service as temporary status for at least three years; and

iii. is in receipt of House Rent Allowance.

2. There have been requests from various offices seeking clarification on the “date of priority” for such temporary status employees for allotment of GPRA.

The matter has been examined and it is clarified that the “date of priority” for allotment of GPRA to employees given temporary status under “Casual labourers(Grant of Temporary Status and Regularization) Scheme of Government of India, 1993”, shall be the date on which they complete three years of service as temporary status employees.

(Swarnali Banerjee)
Deputy Director of Estates (Policy)

Original Copy

Constitution of Empowered Committee of Secretaries for processing the Report of the Seventh Central Pay Commission

Constitution of Empowered Committee of Secretaries for processing the Report of the Seventh Central Pay Commission

No.1-4/2015-E.III(A)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Expenditure

New Delhi, dated the 27th January, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject:
It has been decided with the approval of the Cabinet to set up an Empowered Committee of Secretaries to process the recommendations of the Seventh Central Pay Commission The Committee will have the following members

1 Cabinet Secretary Chairman
2 Finance Secretary/Secretary (Expenditure) Member
3 Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training Member
4 Secretary, Department of Pension & PW Member
5 Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs Member
6 Secretary, Ministry of Defence Member
7 Secretary, Department of Revenue Member
8 Secretary, Department of Posts Member
9 Secretary, Department of Health Member
10 Secretary, Department of Science & Technology Member
11 Chairman, Railway Board Member
12 Deputy Comptroller & Auditor General Member
13 Secretary (Security), Cabinet Secretariat Member

2. The Committee may co-opt any other Secretary, whenever found necessary.

3. The Empowered Committee will function as a Screening Committee to screen the recommendations of the Commission after taking into account the views of the concerned stakeholders, viz, the Ministries/Departments, Staff Associations and the JCM, so as to firm up the final conclusions for approval of the Cabinet.

4. The Implementation Cell created in the Department of Expenditure shall function as Secretariat for the Empowered Committee of Secretaries.

5. The final recommendations of the Empowered Committee of Secretaries will be submitted for approval of the Cabinet.

(Annie George Mathew)
Joint Secretary to the Government of India

Original Copy

Change of Definition of OROP in Various Correspondence of DESW Noticed

Change of Definition of OROP in Various Correspondence of DESW Noticed

25th January 2016

Shri Manohar Parrikar
Hon’ble Raksha Mantri
104, South Block, New Delhi

Change of Definition of OROP in Various Correspondence of DESW Noticed

Dear Sh Manohar Parrikar Ji

Pl refer to:
1. MOD letter no 12(01/2014-D (Pen/Pol) dated 26 Feb 14
2. MOM of the meeting chaired by RM on 26 Feb 14 to discuss OROP
3. Reply of MOS Defense Sh Rao Inderjit Singh Dated 2 Dec 14 in a written reply to Sh Rajeev Chandrashekhar in Rajya Sabha
4. GOI press release dated 5 Sep 15
5. GOI letter no 12(1)/2014 dated 7 Nov 15 and
6. GOI letter no 12(01)/2014-D(pen/pol)- Part–II dated 14 Dec 15

GOI has accepted following definition of OROP in the letters dated 26 Feb 14 and MOS statement in Rajya Sabha dated 2 Dec 14.

One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners, and also future enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners.

However in the Press Release dated 5 Sep 14, a phrase has been added at the end of the OROP definition “at periodic intervals”.

Definition of OROP given in 5 Sep Press Release is given below:

One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service, irrespective of their date of retirement. Future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners at periodic intervals.

This phrase has probably been added to justify pension equalisation every five years as is being propagated by the MOD.

Again, another attempt has been made to change/ distort the definition of OROP in GOI notification dated 7 Nov 15. OROP definition given in 7 Nov letter is reproduced below.

One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension be paid to the Defence Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service, regardless of their date of retirement, which implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners at periodic intervals.

I am sure you would notice subtle progressive change in the language of definition of OROP, wherein the line “This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners, and also future enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioner” has been changed with the line “This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners at periodic intervals”.

It further states as one of the salient features that it has been decided that the gap between rate of pension of current pensioners and past pensioners would be refixed every five years.

This completely changes the definition of OROP and if implemented in its changed form, it will deprive past pensioners of monetary benefits and will completely destroy the definition of OROP and in turn, destroy the very soul of OROP.

UFESM (JM) believes that this change in the definition in OROP has been inserted only to justify pension equalisation every five years. Pension equalisation every five years is against the definition of OROP and is a matter of serious concern for all Ex-servicemen. The correct and acceptable situation is that pension equalisation must be done as soon as pension of two soldiers with same rank and same length of service is noticed to be different and it must be equalised immediately. Ex-servicemen are ready to accept pension equalisation every year only to make administration of this concept easily implementable. Incidentally, any computation can be easily achieved on press of a button in today’s computer era – and this needs no emphasis.

However the matter did not end at one instance of change of definition of OROP, it has been once again repeated in GOI letter dated 14 Dec 15 “OROP implies that uniform pension be paid to the Defence Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service, regardless of their date of retirement, which implies that bridging the gap between the rate of pension of current and past pensioners at periodic intervals”.

The GOI letter dated 14 Dec 15 is the notification for the formation of one-man judicial committee. It is a matter of great importance that if incorrect definition is given to the Chairman of anomalies committee, he is bound to work within the constraints given by MOD and will thus give his recommendations as per incorrect definition given to him. This will be gross injustice to ex-servicemen. Ex-servicemen might be justified to think that these changes are a planned move for the vexed problem of OROP in view of the past experiences in which meanings of Honorable Supreme Court orders were changed by making subtle changes in the decision of HSC.

We sincerely hope that these changes are probably only clerical errors and not a planned direction change. We therefore sincerely request you to correct these mistakes in definition of OROP and give following definition approved by Parliament to all committees.

One Rank One Pension (OROP) implies that uniform pension be paid to the Armed Forces Personnel retiring in the same rank with the same length of service irrespective of their date of retirement and any future enhancement in the rates of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners. This implies bridging the gap between the rate of pension of the current pensioners and the past pensioners, and also future enhancements in the rate of pension to be automatically passed on to the past pensioners.

We will be thankful to get a suitable reply from you at the earliest.

With regards,

Yours Sincerely,

Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)
Advisor United Front of Ex Servicemen & Chairman IESM

Source-http://ex-servicemenwelfare.blogspot.in/

Immovable Property Return the year 2015

Immovable Property Return the year 2015

No. 26/2/2015-CS.I (PR)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions,
Department of Personnel & Training

2nd Floor, Lok Navak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi,
Dated 27th January. 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Immovable Property Return the year 2015 (as on 31.12.2015)

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s Office Memorandums of even number dated 21.12.2015 and 18.01.2016 on the subject cited above (available at persmin.nic.in -> DOPT -> Central Secretairat -> CSS -> Property Return).

2. A large number of CSS Officers have not yet submitted the Immovable Properly Retun for the year 2015 on 31.12.2015). As already informed, IPR should be submitted by all CSS officers through the Web Based Cadre Management System which is hosted at cscms.nic.in. However, as large number of officers are accessing the system, it has become slow making it diflicult to submit the return online. As the system is web based, officers may try filing IPR beyond office hours when the system is less congested. If it is still not possible to file the return online for any reason, they should file the return in paper format to their offices by the stipulated date i.e. 31.01.2016. They may subsequently file the same through cscms.nic.in.

(V.Srinivasaragavan)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Immovable

Republic Day Celebrations and Beating the Retreat Ceremony 2016

Republic Day Celebrations and Beating the Retreat Ceremony 2016

No. D-32018/1/2016-SSO
Government of India
Ministry of Home Affairs
***

NDCC-II Building, Jai Singh Road,
New Delhi, dated the 14th January, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub:- Republic Day Celebrations and Beating the Retreat Ceremony 2016- security arrangements in government buildings for these occasions-reg

In connection with the Republic Day celebrations 2016 Delhi Police will be conducting Anti Sabotage Checks(ASC) in buildings at Annexure -A on 25.01.2016. For this purpose the said buildings are to be vacated latest by 1300 hrs on 25.01.2016 so that the rooms are sealed after regular ASCs is completed. The security arrangements by Delhi Police will be continued up to 1300 hrs on 26.01.2016. Also the said buildings will have to be vacated to facilitate ASCs by 1830 hours on 22.01.2016 till 1300 hours on 23.01.2016 as full dress-rehearsal shall be done on 23.01.2016.

2. Similarly for At home function on 26.01.2016, the ASCs of the buildings, as per list enclosed at Annexure -B are to be conducted by Delhi Police on 26.01.2016.The said buildings will remain closed till 1930 hours on 26.01.2016.

3. Similarly for the Beating the Retreat Ceremony on 29.01.2016,the ASCs of the buildings, as per list enclosed at Annexure-C are to be conducted by Delhi Police on 29.01.2016. The said buildings are to be vacated by 1200 hours on 29.01.2016 so that rooms are sealed after regular ASCs. The arrangement by Delhi Police will be continued till 1930 hours on 29.01.2016.

4. Similarly for the full dress rehearsal for Beating the Retreat Ceremony on 28.01.2016,the ASCs of tho buildings, as per list enclosed at Annexure-D are to be conducted by Delhi Police on 28.01.2016. The said buildings will have to be vacated by 1600 hours to 1930 hours on 28.01.2016.

5. In order to facilit Delhi Police in conducting ASCs on 22nd , 23rd , 25th , 26th , 28th & 29th January,2016 in t4 . buildiq, as per Annexes A,B,C & D, the Ministries/ Departments housed in these building are requested to issue directions to ensure that the Caretakers in these buildings are available on these dates along with keys of all rooms so that the ASCs can be conducted without any obstruction.

[Amarendra Singh]
Under Secretary to the Govt. of India

Original Copy

Union demands 44% hike on 7th CPC recommendation

Union demands 44% hike on 7th CPC recommendation

Implementing the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission( 7th CPC) is not going to be a cakewalk for the government.

The brewing discontent amongst the central government employees is threatening to create a storm and disrupt the implementation process. The unions are asking around 44 percent hike on the basic minimum pay suggested by the 7th Central Pay Commission.

The 7thCPC had recommended the minimum pay at Rs 18,000 and the maximum pay at Rs 250,000, but the employee unions wants the minimum pay to be hikes from Rs 18,000 per month to Rs 26,000–a rise of around 44.4 percent.

The unions are claiming that the pay panel has recommended the lowest hike in basic pay since independence

The Central government employees’ unions have not only demanded to increase the minimum pay of central government employees, but also want government to review the salaries of central government employees after every 5 years instead of the current 10 years.

They also want the minimum pay to be applied across all the states in the country.

The unions argue that pay scales vary from states to states.

The unions have upped the ante on salary hike since the government set up empowered committee of secretaries headed by Cabinet Secretary earlier in January to process the recommendations of the 7th CPC.

The unions had staged a 3-day agitation earlier in January, and even threatened to strike work for longer period.

Considering the impact of the financial burden on the government, the government may not be able to review the salary scale suggested by the 7th CPC.

Finance Minister had said that the recommendations of the 7th CPC would add at least Rs 1.02 lakh crore spending in 2016.

Source : Zee News

Additional benefit on death/disability of Government servant covered by New Pension System

Additional benefit on death/disability of Government servant covered by New Pension System

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (BHARAT SARKAR)
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAIL MANTRALAYA)
(RAILWAY BOARD)

No. 2012/F(E)III/1(1)/4

New Delhi,
Dated: 13 .01.2016.

The GMs/FA&CA0s,
All Indian Railways/Production Units.
(As per mailing list)

Subject: Additional benefit on death/disability of Government servant covered by New Pension System — clarification regarding.

Please refer to the instructions issued vide Board’s letters No. 2008/AC-II/21/19, dated 29.05.2009, No. 2010/AC-11/21/18 dated 02.07.2013 and letter of even number dated 08.09.2014 on the above mentioned subject.

2. Now, one of the recognized Federations (NFIR) have raised the issue of non-compliance of the above instructions by Zonal Railways and reluctance on the part of Railways in providing additional relief.

3. It is reiterated. That the aforesaid instructions may be followed scrupulously and all pending cases be disposed of at the earliest.

(Sanjay Prashar)
Deputy Director Finance (Esft.)III,
Railway Board.

Retention of leased accommodation by Railway officers/staff while on Study Leave

Retention of leased accommodation by Railway officers/staff while on Study Leave

RBE NO: 06/2016

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA/Bharat Sarkar
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS/Rail Mantralaya
Railway Board

No.E(G) 2016 QR-1-1

New Delhi, Dated : 11.01.16

The General Managers,
All Indian Railways/PSUs and others.
(As per standard mailing list)

Sub: Retention of leased accommodation by Railway officers/staff while on Study Leave.

The existing instructions regarding retention of leased/hired accommodation allotted to Railway officers on occurrence of events like transfer/deputation/retirement/death etc. have been notified in terms of Railway Board’s letter No. 1998/LMB/12/18 dated 09.12.98 and letter No. 2001/LMB/12/21 dated 28.02.2002, as mentioned in Item No. 12 of the Railway Board’s Master Circular No. 2005/LMB/12/Master Circular dated 05.05.2006.

2. The above mentioned provisions on retention of leased accommodation have since been reviewed by Railway Board and inpartial modification thereof, it has now been decided:-

2.1. While on Study Leave Railway officers/staff may be allowed retention of leased accommodation during the period of study leave subject to allotment of Govt./Railway accommodation, and

2.2. Retention of leased accommodation may be allowed to Railway officers/staff during Study Leave as indicated below:-

(a) In case the period of Study Leave is six months or less and the officer/employee is in occupation of leased accommodation as per his/her entitlement, he/she may retain the leased accommodation for entire period of Study Leave on payment of normal licence fee.

(b) In such cases where the period of Study Leave extends beyond six months, the officer/employee may retain leased accommodation as per his/her entitlement for the period beyond six months on payment of double the licence fee or he/she may accept leased accommodation of one level below his/her entitlement in which case he/she will be liable to pay normal licence fee.

(c) While on Study Leave the leased accommodation shall be permitted to be retained till allotment of Government/Railway accommodation and any occupation thereafter shall be treated as unauthorized.

3. This issues with the concurrence of Finance Directorate of the Ministry of Railways.

4. Please acknowledge receipt.

(Sanjay Gauri)
Dy. Dir. Estt. (Genl.)-II

Original Copy

Just In