DA Calculation Sheet

when will aicpin realese for june 2013..

when will aicpin realese…

Madam/Sir,
Expecting today, the release of AICPI as on 30/06/2013

Dear Friends, This time we need minimum 10% DA hike w.e.f. July’13. It will happend?

if any body having the details of Contributory pension scheme please attach or describe it what are the conditions prevailing…

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GET 10 % DA FROM JULY-2013
IT WAS OFFICALLY ANNOUNCED ON 31ST EVINING OF THIS MONTH
WAIT AND SEE

NOTE !=====================================>

Expected DA from July-2013 will be not less than 90% after 2 point increase in Index
As all are waiting for announcement of Dearness Allowance for Central Government Employees from January, 2013, which has been not announced till the writing of this post. In the meanwhile Ministry of Labour & Employment has published Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers (CPI-IW) February 2013. According the press release the the All-India CPI-IW for February, 2013 rose by 2 points and pegged at 223 (two hundred and twenty three). This two point increase showing confirm 10% increase in Dearness Allowance from July, 2013. Hence Expected DA from July, 2013 will be not less than 90%. It is also make clear from following table:-

Expectation Increase/
Decrease
Index Month Base
Year 2001
= 100 Total
of 12
Months Twelve
Monthly
Average %
increase
over
115.76
for DA DA
Announced
or will be
announced

Jul-12 212 2414 201.17 73.78% 72%

2 Aug-12 214 2434 202.83 75.22% 80%

1 Sep-12 215 2452 204.33 76.51%

2 Oct-12 217 2471 205.92 77.88%

1 Nov-12 218 2490 207.50 79.25%

1 Dec-12 219 2512 209.33 80.83%
First Expectation 2 Jan-13 221 2535 211.25 82.49% 82%
2 Feb-13 223 2559 213.25 84.22% 84%
1 Mar-13 224 2582 215.17 85.87% 85%
1 Apr-13 225 2602 216.83 87.31% 87%
1 May-13 226 2622 218.50 88.75% 88%
1 Jun-13 227 2641 220.08 90.12% 90%
1 Jul-13 Expected DA from July-2013 90%

Second Expectation 2 Jan-13 221 2535 211.25 82.49% 82%
2 Feb-13 223 2559 213.25 84.22% 84%
2 Mar-13 225 2583 215.25 85.95% 85%
2 Apr-13 227 2605 217.08 87.53% 87%
2 May-13 229 2628 219.00 89.18% 89%
2 Jun-13 231 2651 220.92 90.84% 90%
2 Jul-13 Expected DA from July-2013 90%

Im a Tamilnadu state government employee and my basic is 16230 in pay band 15600-39100 GP 5400.
My designation is Assistant Engineer. I just want to know whether im a gazetted officer. If so Gazetted-A or Gazetted-B

from current position aicpin-iw for the month of june is 230 or 231
it will be confirmed on 31st of this month
hence we get 10% da from july-13

NOTE!!!===========>$~5-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: April 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1535/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …..Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus CENTRAL GOVT. SAG & ORS. ….. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Nidhesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.K.Ghosh and Mr.Tarun Gupta, Advocates W.P.(C) 2348/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …..Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus D.L.VHORA & ORS. ….. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sushil Kumar Malik, Advocate W.P.(C) 2349/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …..Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 2 of 13
PPS GUMBER & ORS. ….. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sushil Kumar Malik, Advocate W.P.(C) 2350/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. …..Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Ruchir Mishra and Mr.Ashish Virmani, Advocates versus CENTRAL GOVERNMENT PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION & ORS. ….. Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sushil Kumar Malik, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)
1. We note that on January 28, 2013 the petitioners have issued an office order dated January 28, 2013 which reads as under:-
“OFFICE MEMORANDUM Sub: Revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners –reg. The undersigned is directed to say that in pursuance of Government’s decision on the recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission, orders were issued for revision of pension/family pensioners vide this Department’s O.M. No.38/37/08 P&PW(A) dated 1.9.2008, as amended from time to time.
2. It has been decided that the pension of pre 2006 pensioners are revised w.e.f. 1.1.2006 in terms of para 4.1 or para 4.2 of the aforesaid OM dated 1.9.2008, as amended from time to time, would be further stepped up to 50% of the sum of minimum of pay in the pay band and the
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 3 of 13
grade pay correspondent to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired, as arrived at with reference to the fitment tables annexed to the Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure OM No.1/1/2008-IC dated 30th August, 2008. In the case of HAG and above scales, this will be 50% of the minimum of the pay in the revised pay scale arrived at with reference to the fitment tables annexed to the above-referred OM dated 30.8.2008 of Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure. 3. The normal family pension in respect of pre-2006 pensioners/family pensioners as revised w.e.f. 01-01-2006 in terms of para 4.1 or para 4.2 of the OM dated 01-09-2008 would also be further stepped up to 30% of the sum of minimum of pay in pay band and the grade pay corresponding to the pre- revised pay scale from which the Government servant had retired, as arrived at with reference to the fitment tables annexed to the Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure OM No.1/1/2008 – IC dated 30-08-2008. In case of HAG and above scales, this will be 50% of the minimum of the pay in the revised pay scale arrived at with reference to the fitment tables annexed to the above referred OM dated 30-08-2008 of Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure). 4. A revised concordance table ( Annexure ) of the pre – 1996, pre-2006 and post 2006 pay scales/pay bands indicating the pension/family pension (at ordinary rates) payable under the above provisions is enclosed to facilitate payment of revised pension/family pension. 5. The pension so arrived at in accordance with para 2 above and indicated in Col.9 of Annexure will be reduced pro-rata, where the pensioner had less than the maximum required service for full pension as per rule 49 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 as applicable before 1.1.2006 and in no case it will be less than Rs. 3500/-p.m.
6. The family pension at enhanced rates (under sub rule (3) (a) of Rule 54 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 of pre-2006 pensioners/family pensioners revised w.e.f. 1.1.2006
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 4 of 13
in terms of para 4.1 or this Department’s OM No.1/3/2011-P&PW(E) dated 25.5.2012 would be further stepped up in the following manner:- (i) In the case of Government servants who died while in service before 01-01-2006 and in respect of whom enhanced family pension is applicable from the date of approval by the Government i.e.24.9.2012, the enhanced family pension will be stepped up to 50% of the sum of minimum of pay in the pay band and the grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale in which the Government servant had died, as arrived at with reference to the fitment table annexed to the Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure OM No.1/1/2008-IC dated 30-08-2008. & In the case of HAG and above scales, this will be 50% of the minimum of the pay in revised pay scale arrived at with reference to the fitment table annexed to the above referred OM dated 30-08-2008 of Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure. (ii) In the case of a pensioner who retired before 01-01-2006 and in respect of whom enhanced family pension is applicable from the date of approval by the Government, i.e.24-09-2012, the enhanced family pension will be stepped up to the amount of pension as revised in terms of para 2 read with para 5 above. In case the pensioner has died before the date of approval by the Government, i.e. 24.09, 2012 the pension will be revised notionally in terms of para 2 read with para 5 above. The amount of revised enhanced family pension will, however, not be less than the amount of family pension at ordinary rates as revised in terms of Para 3 above. 7. In case the pension consolidated pension/family pension/enhanced family pension calculated as per Para 4.1 of OM No. 38/37/08-P&PW (A) dated 01-09-2008 is higher than the pension/family pension calculated in the manner indicated above, the same ( higher consolidated pension/family pension ) will continue to be treated as basic pension/family pension.
8. All other conditions as given in OM No.38/37/08-P &
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 5 of 13
PW(A) dated 1.9.2008 as amended from time to time shall remain unchanged. 9. These orders will take effect from the date of approval by the Government, i.e. 24-09-2012. There will be no change in the amount of revised pension/family pension paid during the period 01-01-2006 and 23-09-2012, and, therefore, no arrears will be payable on account of these orders for that period. 10. In their application to the persons belonging to the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, these orders issue in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General of India. 11 All the Ministries/Departments are requested to bring the contents of these orders to the notice of Controller of Accountants/Pay and Accounts Officer s and attached and subordinate Offices under them on a top priority basis. All pension disbursing officers are also advised to prominently display these orders on their notice boards for the benefit of pensioners. 12. Hindi version will follow. Sd/- (Tripti P.Ghosh) Director To All Ministries/Departments of Government of India As per mailing list.”
2. The only issue therefore which survives is, with respect to paragraph 9, of the office memorandum aforenoted which makes it applicable with effect from September 24, 2012, and thereby denying arrears to be paid to the pensioners with effect from January 01, 2006.
3. In short, the Government of India has tacitly admitted that it was in the wrong and that the Tribunal is correct.
4. As is well known, the recommendations of the 6th Pay
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 6 of 13
Commission did away with the hitherto fore applicable pay scales; replacing the same with pay bands having grade pay. For example, pay band I (PB-I) was `5200-20200 and embraced 12 previous pay scales between `2750-4400 and `8000-13500, but with 12 grade pays between `1800-5400.
5. How would the existing pensioners get pension was decided by the Government as per a resolution dated August 29, 2008 which accepted para 5.1.47 of the recommendations of the 6th Pay Commission to the following effect:-
“All past pensioners should be allowed fitment benefit equal to 40% of the pension excluding the effect of merger of 50% dearness allowance/dearness relief as pension (in respect of pensioners retiring on or after 1/4/2004) and dearness pension (for other pensioners) respectively. The increase will be allowed by subsuming the effect of conversion of 50% of dearness relief/dearness allowance as dearness pension/dearness pay. Consequently, dearness relief at the rate of 74% on pension (excluding the effect of merger) has been taken for the purposes of computing revised pension as on 1/1/2006. This is consistent with the fitment benefit being allowed in case of the existing employees. The fixation of pension will be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than fifty percent of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired.”
6. The respondents had made many submissions in their favour; two of which pertained to the law declared by the Supreme Court in the decision reported as 1990 (4) SCC 270 D.S.Nakara Vs. UOI and (2008) 9 SCC 125 UOI Vs. S.P.S.Vains. The Tribunal has negated said pleas. However, reasoning of the respondents on other plea pertaining to
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 7 of 13
resolution No.12 aforesaid has found favour with the Tribunal.
7. We find that a Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court deciding W.P.(C) No.19641/2009 R.K.Aggarwal & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors. has referred to the decision impugned by the Tribunal, with reference to an identical question which arose in the State of Haryana because Government of Haryana had adopted the same policy decision of the Central Government. In the decision dated December 21, 2012, in paragraphs 21 to 26, the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court has reasoned as under:-
“21. On the recommendations made by VI CPC, which stood validly accepted by the Cabinet, it was argued before the Tribunal that principle for determining the pension has been completely altered under the garb of clarification. It was argued that on the basis of the aforesaid resolution/modified parity revised pension of the pre-2006 pensioners shall not be less than 50% of the minimum of the pay band + grade pay, corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired. 22. The Tribunal has accepted this contention and because of this reason, it is held that subsequent OMs dated 03.10.2008 and 14.10.2008 purportedly issued to clarify para 4.2 of OM dated 01.09.2008 were contrary to the plain meaning of the said para and whereby the criteria and principle for determination of the pension had been completely changed that too when these two subsequent OMs dated 03.10.2008 and 14.10.2008 were issued by the lower authorities having no power to issue such clarification.
23 After considering the arguments of learned counsels for all the parties, we are of the opinion that it is not even necessary to go into the various nuances and nitty grittys, which are insisted by learned counsels for the petitioners based on D.S. Nakara line of cases and N. Subbarayudu and others and S.R. Dhingra and others (supra), wherein ratio of D.S. Nakara is explained. We proceed on the basis
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 8 of 13
that fixation of cut off date by the government was in order and to this extent we agree with the reasoning given by the Tribunal where similar arguments, as advanced by the petitioners before us, were rejected. The issue can be resolved on the interpretation of OM dated 29.08.2008 itself. It is not in dispute that vide resolution dated 29.08.2008, recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission were accepted by the government and the pension was also to be fixed on the basis of formula contained therein. We have already reproduced the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission, as contained in para 5.1.47, which was accepted by the government vide Item No. 12 of resolution dated 29.08.2008 with certain modifications. Based on this resolution, OM dated 01.09.2008 was issued. We have also reproduced para 4.2 thereof. This states in unequivocal terms that “revised pension in no case shall be lower than 50% of the minimum of pay in the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale——”. The clear purport and meaning of the aforesaid provision is that those who retired before 01.01.2006 as well were ensured that their revised pension after enforcing recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission, shall not be less than 50% of the minimum of the pay band plus grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioners had retired. However, notwithstanding the same and without any provocation, the junior functionaries in the Department of Pension nurtured a doubt “though there was none” and note was prepared on that basis, which led to issuance of OMs dated 03.10.2008 and 14.10.2008. The effect of these two OMs was to make revision in the pension of pre-2006 retirees by giving them less than 50% of the sum of minimum of the pay in the pay band. To demonstrate this, Mr. H.L. Tikku, learned senior counsel appearing in some of these cases drew our attention to the following chart:-
Min of Pre-revised scale
Pay in the Pay Band
Grade Pay
Revised Basic Pay (2+3) (`)
Pension 50% of (2+3) (`)
1
2
3
4
5
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 9 of 13
S-24 (14300)
37400
8700
46100
23050
S-25 (15100)
39690
8700
48390
24195
S-26 (16400)
39690
8900
48590
24295
S-27 (16400)
39690
8900
48590
24295
S-28 (14300)
37400
10000
47400
23700
S-29 (18400)
44700
10000
54700
27350
The first 4 columns of the above table have been extracted from the pay fixation annexed with MOF OM of 30th August, 2008 (referred to in para 4.5 (iii) above). Revised pension of S 29 works out to `27,350 which has been reduced to `23,700 as per DOP OM of 03.10.2008 (para 4.8 (B) below). 24. As per the impugned OM dated 14.10.2008 in the case of S-24 officers the corresponding pay in the Pay Band against 14,300/- is shown as 37,400/-. In addition, Grade Pay of `8700/- was given totaling `46,100/-. Similarly, revisions concerning all the other pay scales were accepted by the aforementioned OM dated 14th October, 2008. The illegality which has been perpetrated in the present matter is apparent from the fact that whereas an officer who was in the pre-revised scale S-24 and receiving a pay of `14,300/- would now receive `37,400/- plus grade pay of `8700/- and his full pension would accordingly be fixed at `23,050/- (i.e. 50% of 37,400/- pay plus grade pay `8700/-) pursuant to the implementation of VI CPC recommendations after 01.01.2006, whereas a person retiring before 01.01.2006, who was drawing a pay of `18,400/- or even `22,400/- (maximum of scale) in the pre-revised S-29 scale will now be getting pension as only 23,700/- (i.e. 50% of pay of ` 37,400/- plus grade pay of `10,000/-). 25. This has arisen because of resolution dated 29.08.2008 and has resulted because of deletion of certain words in para 4.2 of the OM dated 01.09.2008 or 03.10.2008. This aspect is beautifully demonstrated by the Tribunal in its Full Bench judgement in the following manner with which we are entirely agree:
“25. In order to decide the matter in controversy, at this stage, it will be useful to extract the relevant portions of para 5.1.47 of the VI CPC recommendation, as accepted by the Resolution dated 29.08.2008, para 4.2 of the OM dated
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 10 of 13
1.9.2008 and subsequent changes made in the garb of clarification dated 3.10.2008, which thus read:
Resolution NO.38/37/8-P&PW (A) dated 29.08.2008 – Para 5.1.47 (page 154-155)
Para 4.2 of OM DOP&PW OM No.38/37/8-P&PW (A) dated 1.09.2008 (page 38 of OA)
OM DOP & PW OM No.38/37/8-P&PW (A) dated 3.10.2008
The fixation as per above will be subject to the provision ‘that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the prerevised pay scale form which the pensioner had retired.
The fixation as per above will be subject to the provision ‘that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the(sum of the) minimum of the pay in the pay band plus (and) the grade pay (thereon) corresponding to the prerevised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired.
The Pension Calculated at 50% of the [sum of the] minimum of the pay in the pay band [and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale] plus grade pay would be calculated (i) at the minimum of the pay in the pay band (irrespective of the pre-revised scale of pay plus) the grade pay corresponding to the prerevised pay scale. For example, if a pensioner had retired in the pre-revised scale of pay of `18400-22400, the corresponding pay band being `37400-
67000 and the
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 11 of 13
corresponding grade pay being `10000 p.m., his minimum guaranteed pension would be 50% of `37400+`10000 (i.e. `23700)
Strike out are deletions and bold letter addition
Strike out are deletions and bold letters addition.
26. As can be seen from the relevant portion of the resolution dated 29.8.2008 based upon the recommendations made by the VI CPC in paragraph 5.1.47, it is clear that the revised pension of the pre-2006 retirees should not be less than 50% of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the Pay Band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale held by the pensioner at the time of retirement. However, as per the OM dated 3.10.2008 revised pension at 50% of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon, corresponding to pre-revised scale from which the pensioner had retired has been given a go-by by deleting the words ‘sum of the’ ‘and grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale’ and adding ‘irrespective of the pre-revised scale of pay plus’ implying that the revised pension is to be fixed at 50% of the minimum of the pay, which has substantially changed the modified parity/formula adopted by the Central Government pursuant to the recommendations made by the VI CPC and has thus caused great prejudice to the applicants. According to us, such a course was not available to the functionary of the Government in the garb of clarification thereby altering the recommendations given by the VI CPC, as accepted by the Central Government. According to us, deletion of the words ‘sum of the’ ‘and grade
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 12 of 13
pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised scale’ ‘and addition of the words ‘irrespective of the prerevised scale of pay plus’, as introduced by the respondents in the garb of clarification vide OM dated 3.10.2008 amounts to carrying out amendment to the resolution dated 29.08.2008 based upon para 4.1.47 of the recommendations of the VI CPC as also the OM dated 1.9.2008 issued by the Central Government pursuant to the aforesaid resolution, which has been accepted by the Cabinet. Thus, such a course was not permissible for the functionary of the Government in the garb of clarification, that too, at their own level without referring the matter to the Cabinet.” 26. It is for the aforesaid reasons, we remark that there is no need to go into the legal nuances. Simple solution is to give effect to the resolution dated 29.08.2008 whereby recommendations of the 6 th Central Pay Commission were accepted with certain modifications. We find force in the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that subsequent OMs dated 03.10.2008 and 14.10.2008 were not in consonance with that resolution. Once we find that this resolution ensures that “the fixation of pension will be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired”, this would clearly mean that the pay of the retiree i.e. who retired before 01.01.2006 is to be brought corresponding to the revised pay scale as per 6th Central Pay Commission and then it has to be ensured that pension fixed is such that it is not lower than 50% of the minimum of the pay in the band and the grade pay thereon. As a result, all these petitions succeed and mandamus is issued to the respondents to refix the pension of the petitioners accordingly within a period of two months and pay the arrears of pension within two months. In case, the arrears are not paid within a period of two months, it will also carry interest @ 9% w.e.f. 01.03.2013. There shall, however, be no order as to cost.”
W.P.(C) Nos.1535/2012 & 2348-50/2012 Page 13 of 13
8. We are in complete agreement with the reasoning of the Division Bench of the Punjab & Haryana High Court and adopt the same and do not burden ourselves any further. We conclude by noting that as regards the substance of the view taken by the Tribunal, even the Central Government accepts its correctness, but insists to make the same applicable prospectively.
9. The writ petitions are dismissed. The decision of the Full Bench of the Tribunal is upheld but without any order as to costs.
(PRADEEP NANDRAJOG) JUDGE (V. KAMESWAR RAO) JUDGE APRIL 29, 2013 mamta

Pl. refer my comments, July 18,2013. The date of judgment may read as 29th April, 2013

(The Govt. of India in its OM F.No.38/37/08-P&PW & Pensions dt. the 28th January, 2013 have issued orders to “Revision of Pension to pre-2006 Pensioners”. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C) 1535/2012, dated 29th April, 2013 have also pronouced Judgment on this Issue. Pl. verify)

The Govt. of India in its OM F.No.38/37/08-P&PW & Pensions dt. the 28th January, 2013 have issued orders to “Revision of Pension to pre-2006 Pensioners”. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in W.P.(C) 1535/2012, dated 29th April, 2012 have also pronouced Judgment on this Issue. Pl. verify

Dear Mr. Puneet Behera, like u I also worried about revision of pension of Pre- 2006 Pensioners. I have read your remarks of 10th July, 2013. Please convey if u get any information on the subject above. Thanks. Dear Mr. Meghalingam Can u please give any light about revision of pension for pre- 2006 pensioners. Govt has ordered over the issue on 28th january 2013. Expecting your response. Thanking you.

what about revision of pree 2006 pensioners?/

NOTE!!!!============================================.!Tuesday, July 09, 2013
BSNL ORDERS : Revised table for fixation of Pay as on 01.01.2007 for the purpose of 50% DA merger to BSNL employees

BSNL ORDERS 2013 – Revised table for fixation of Pay as on 01.01.2007 for the purpose of 50% DA merger to BSNL employees

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limted, a Government of India Enterprises has issued orders on pay fixation as on 1.1.2007 for the benefit of merger of 50% DA effectively amounting to 78.2%, the revised fixation table for pay revision of Non-Executives also given in the order itself.

The office order is reproduced and given for your information…

CORPORATE OFFICE

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD
(A Government of India Enterprise)
Bharat Sanchar Bhawan
H.C. Mathur Lane, New Delhi-01

No. 1-16/2010-PAT(BSNL)
Dated: 08-07-2013
To
All Heads of Telecom circles.
All Heads of other Administrative units.

Subject: Revised table for fixation of Pay as on 01.01.2007 in respect of Non-executives of BSNL.

Orders have been issued for allowing the benefit of merger of 50% DA effectively amounting to 78.2% as on 1.1.2007 for the purpose of fitment in respect of Non-executive employees of BSNL w.e.f. 10.6.2013, vide this Office order No. 1-16/2010-PAT(BSNL) dated 10.6.2013.

2. The revised tables for fixation of Pay as on 01.01.2007 in respect of Non-Executives of BSNL, are enclosed as Annexure for your information & further necessary action.

3. Errors & omissions are subject to rectifications and correction. Over payments made, if any, shall be recovered as per rules.

End: As above

Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(A.Sinha)
Assistant General Manager (Pers.V & Pension)

Annexure

NOTE !!!.Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Benefit of Merger of 50% DA effectively amounting to 78.2% as on 01.01.2007 to BSNL Employees – DoT issued Orders

Benefit of Merger of 50% DA effectively amounting to 78.2% as on 01.01.2007 to BSNL Employees – DoT issued Orders

One of the major union, BSNL Employees Union has published with cheer the settlement news about the long pending demand of ‘Merger of 50% DA’…

78.2% IDA merger settled.
DoT issued Presidential Directive.
Hearty congratulations to one and all.

The order on 78.2% IDA merger has finally been issued today the 10-06-2013, by the DoT. BSNL will issue the order tomorrow. It is a matter of great joy and relief that one of the most burning problem of the BSNL employees has finally been settled. Undoubtedly, the call for indefinite strike and the total determination of the entire employees to fight out the demand has settled the issue. The credit goes to the unity of the employees. CHQ congratulates the entire employees as well as the all the unions and associations for this great achievement. Forum of BSNL Unions and Associations has once again done a commendable job by uniting all, which made the settlement possible. CHQ also heartily thanks the Secretary, DoT, CMD BSNL, Director (Finance) and Director (HR) for trying their best to bring in a settlement and also for avoiding the indefinite strike. It is also a matter of great joy that the retired comrades will get their pension refixed based on 78.2% IDA.

No 61-01/2012-SU
Government of India
Ministry of Communications and Information Technology
Department of Telecommunications

Sanchar Bhavan, 20 Ashoka Road
New Delhi 110001

Dated, the 10th June, 2013

In exercise of the powers conferred by the Article 145 of Articles of Association of the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), the President is pleased to approve the proposal of BSNL regarding the fitment formula as per Department of Public Enterprises OM No.2(70)/08- DPE(WC)-GL-VII/09 dated 02.04.2009, Accordingly, in partial modification of this Department’s Order No. 61-01/2009-SU dated 27.02.2009, the benefit of merger of 50% DA effectively amounting to 78.2% as on 01.01.2007 for the purpose of fitment in respect of the Board level & below Board Level executives and Non-Unionized Supervisors and Non- executives of BSNL is hereby allowed from the date of issue of this order.

2. No arrears will be paid and the revised fitment on the basis of DPE OM dated 02.04.2009 will be paid with prospective effect only.

3. BSNL has to bear the additional financial implication on account of revised fitment benefit for pay revision from its own resources and no budgetary support will be provided.

4. All instructions/guidelines issued by DPE from time to time in this regard may be scrupulously followed.

5. This has the concurrence of Internal Finance Division(TPF), Department of Telecommunications vide Dy. No. 05/171/PSF/13 dated 10.06.2013.

sd/-
(Sanjeev Gupta)

NOTE!!!=================================================>Labour Bureau
Government of India

INDEX NUMBERS

Advance Release Calendar

Centre wise CPI(IW)

Centre wise CPI(AL/RL)

Consumer Price Index (Industrial Workers) Base 2001=100 – Statement showing the Average Monthly Prices of selected articles for Industrial Workers

CPI(IW) Base 2001 – GROUP/SUBGroup INDICES FOR JULY 2008

CPI(IW) Base 2001=100 Monthly Index Letter – MAY 2013

Index Number
Base Year
All India General Index

April 2013
May 2013

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers – CPI(IW)
2001=100
226
228

April 2013
May 2013

Consumer Price Index Numbers forAgricultural Labourers
1986-87= 100
711

719

Consumer Price Index Numbers for Rural Labourers
1986-87=100
711

720

CENTRE-WISE CPI(IW)
State
Sr. No.
Centre
Apr. 2013
May 2013
State
Sr. No.
Centre
Apr. 2013 May 2013

AP
1
GODAVARIKHANI
233 235
MHR
44
MUMBAI
229 231

2
GUNTUR
223 227

45
NAGPUR
256 264

3
HYDERABAD
202 206

46
NASIK
235 242

4
VIJAYAWADA
230 234

47
PUNE
230 232

5
VISHAKHAPATANAM
227 231

48
SHOLAPUR
233 234

6
WARRANGAL
239 245
ORI
49
ANGUL-TALCHER
233 235

ASM
7
DOOM DOOMA- TINSUKIA
189 189

50
ROURKELA
237 241

8
GUWAHATI
191 193
PND
51
PONDICHERRY
234 237

9
LABAC- SILCHAR
204 208
PUN
52
AMRITSAR
238 236

10
MARIANI-JORHAT
191 192

53
JALANDHAR
222 219

11
RANGAPARA- TEZPUR
180 180

54
LUDHIANA
217 216

BIH
12
MONGHYR- JAMALPUR
230 232
RJN
55
AJMER
230 229

CHD
13
CHANDIGARH
226 226

56
BHILWARA
231 230

CHS
14
BHILAI
257 261

57
JAIPUR
225 224

DLH
15
DELHI
206 200
TN
58
CHENNAI
210 218

GOA
16
GOA
247 251

59
COIMBATORE
213 216

GUJ
17
AHMEDABAD
226 227

60
COONOOR
220 226

18
BHAVNAGAR
219 218

61
MADURAI
212 218

19
RAJKOT
230 230

62
SALEM
213 217

20
SURAT
211 212

63
TIRUCHIRAPALLY
229 230

21
VADODARA
210 215
TRP
64
TRIPURA
184 190

HRY
22
FARIDABAD
219 219
UP
65
AGRA
233 235

23
YAMUNANAGAR
230 227

66
GHAZIABAD
228 223

HP
24
HIMACHAL PRADESH
201 205

67
KANPUR
228 230

J & K
25
SRINAGAR
199 195

68
LUCKNOW
220 219

JRK
26
BOKARO
220 219

69
VARANASI
223 221

27
GIRIDIH
272 272
WB
70
ASANSOL
247 248

28
JAMSHEDPUR
243 246

71
DARJEELING
211 211

29
JHARIA
253 253

72
DURGAPUR
255 256

30
KODARMA
249 253

73
HALDIA
226 228

31
RANCHI HATIA
257 258

74
HOWRAH
212 213

KNT
32
BELGAUM
239 241

75
JALPAIGURI
212 212

33
BENGLURU
236 237

76
KOLKATA
214 218

34
HUBLI DHARWAR
239 245

77
RANIGANJ
207 211

35
MERCARRA
236 239

78
SILIGURI
208 208

36
MYSORE
239 243

ALL INDIA INDEX
226 228

KRL
37
ERNAKULAM
221 222

38
MUNDAKAYAM
246 251

39
QUILON
230 231

MP
40
BHOPAL
231 233

41
CHHINDWARA
234 237

42
INDORE
218 220

43
JABALPUR
225 228

CPI(IW) Base 2001=100 Monthly Index Letter – MAY 2013

CENTRE-WISE CPI(AL/RL)

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX NUMBERS(GENERAL) FOR AGRICULTURAL
AND RURAL LABOURERS (BASE 1986-87=100)
Sr.No.
State
Agricultural Labourers April 2013
Agricultural Labourers May 2013
Rural Labourers April 2013
Rural Labourers May 2013

1
Andhra Pradesh
758
771
757
769

2
Assam
686
692
690
696

3
Bihar
640
629
643
633

4
Gujarat
718
726
715
723

5
Haryana
784
788
779
781

6
Himachal Pradesh
557
560
587
592

7
Jammu & Kashmir
689
694
687
692

8
Karnataka
775
792
772
789

9
Kerala
698
708
697
707

10
Madhya Pradesh
691
699
699
709

11
Maharashtra
764
773
759
768

12
Manipur
650
658
652
660

13
Meghalaya
713
725
708
720

14
Orissa
645
657
646
658

15
Punjab
772
775
763
768

16
Rajasthan
773
776
760
764

17
Tamil Nadu
722
733
716
727

18
Tripura
592
597
589
592

19
Uttar Pradesh
681
684
681
684

20
West Bengal
663
682
669
689

ALL INDIA
711
719
711
720

Advance Release Calendar

Release of
Index for
Jan
2013
Feb
2013
March
2013
April
2013
May
2013
June
2013
July
2013
Aug
2013
Sep
2013
Oct
2013
Nov
2013
Dec
2013

CPI(IW)

New Series Base 2001=100
28 Feb
2013
28 Mar
2013
30 Apr
2013
31 May
2013
28 Jun
2013
31 Jul
2013
30 Aug
2013
27 Sep
2013
31 Oct
2013
29 Nov
2013
31 Dec
2013
31 Jan
2014

CPI(AL/RL)
20 Feb
2013
20 Mar
2013
18 Apr
2013
20 May
2013
20 Jun
2013
19 Jul
2013
20 Aug
2013
20 Sep
2013
18 Oct
2013
20 Nov
2013
20 Dec
2013
20 Jan
2014

Though 30/06/2013 falls on Sunday, the AICPI and updation on DA Eligibility up to 31/05/2013 was published on 30/06/2013. Thanks a lot.

DA calculation sheet is not displaying.pl look into il.we may expect DA as on 1.7.13 would be 10%.

IF AICPIN-IW DRCREASES 5 POINTS THEN THAT TIME BE WE WILL GET 10% DA