S. No. 18 — Grant of entry pay recommended by 6th CPC to the promotees under the provisions of CCS(RP) Rules- 2008.
Department of Expenditure had through their letter dated 24.01.2017 informed that the recommendation of the NAC for grant of entry pay to all the promotees under 6th CPC had been considered by that Department. However, it was not agreed to considering the fact that it was in modification of the recommendations of the 6th CPC. This decision was taken with approval of Finance Minister.
However, in the light of the order of the CAT, Principal Bench, Chennai, they have requested Ministry of Defence and Department of Revenue to intimate the action taken by them since the applicants of the OAs are working in those departments. A reply is yet to be received.
Staff-Side stated that this problem is acute in organisations where there is no direct recruit or recruitment has not taken place for some time. As such there is no junior direct recruit employee. Considering the submission made by the Staff-Side that no person’s salary could be fixed at less than the minimum of the pay scale or pay band, as the case may be, the Official Side had agreed to raise the pay of promotee officials on par with directly recruited personnel, irrespective of the fact whether direct recruitment has really taken place or not. The said agreement ought to have been translated into order. It is not correct for the Finance Minister to dishonour the agreement and no tangible reason has also been advanced by the Official Side for such a decision. Noting this to be an anomalous situation which causes suffering to the employees, it was decided that the Department of Expenditure would re-examine.
{Action: D/o Expenditure}
Standing Commitee Meeting 31 Agenda Item Status – Check here
Please confirm as to wether the deputationists joind between 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2015, appointed to higher post on deputation basis as also eligible for grant of entry pay.
Why rbe 158 /2018 is only for few posts only. When it is being ignored whether or not direct recruits joined,and direct entry is ensured for those posts, similarly why can’t direct entry pay be given to all posts irrespective of whether there is provision for direct entry or not. Railway board may please review this. Moreover entry pay was assured in every other pc, except 6th pc.
Please confirm as to wether the deputationists joind between 01-01-2016 to 31-12-2015, appointed to higher post on deputation basis as also eligible for grant of entry pay.
Whether available CAT Chennai Bench Judgement regarding entry pay to promottee as par Direct recurttee
W.r.t. judgement order dated 6th March 2017, of Hon’ble CAT, New Delhi, AAOs promoted under 6th cpc have been granted minimum entry pay vide Dept. Of Exp. vide OM dated 7th Feb 2018. On the same analogy, Assistants who were promoted and denied minimum entry pay under 6th cpc should also be given minimum entry pay Rs.17140/-.
Due to denial of entry pay to promtee asstts under 6th cpc, Assts got promoted in 2009 could not reach the entry of that post even after earning 6 increments. Since the pay is less than entry pay, they are not eligible for bunching benefit under 7th cpc as per latest dopt om. Now an asst promoted in 2009 and in 2015 are drawing same pay in 7th cpc. 44900. This leads to serious pay anomaly and to be addressed at the earliest
Cat chennai ke order ki copy mil sakti he
MACP at par with direct recruitee in 6 CPC be re-examined and cleared