Home Blog Page 736

Revision of pension in r/o pre-2006 Commissioned Officers/JCOs/ORs pensioners/ Family pensioners

By
igeadmin
-

Revision of pension in r/o pre-2006 Commissioned Officers/JCOs/ORs pensioners/ Family pensioners

OFFICE OF THE PR. CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS)
DRAUPADI GHAT, ALLAHABAD- 211014

Circular No. 551

Dated: 28.12.2015

Subject :- Revision of pension in r/o pre-2006 Commissioned Officers/JCOs/ORs pensioners/ Family pensioners.

Reference:- This office Circular No. 547 dated 11.09.2015.

***********

Pension Disbursing Agencies are aware that as per this office Circular No. 547 dt.- 11.09.2015, Service/Family Pension in respect of JCOs/ORs are to be revised w.e.f. 01.01.2006 by the Pension Disbursing Agencies as per tables attached with circular. Specific tables for revision of Special Pension/Invalid Pension/ Service Element of Disability Pension in respect of Pre- 01.01.2006 PBORs retirees discharged with less than 15 years of qualifying service and Service Pension of TA personnel irrespective of their qualifying service have not been prepared as the Pension Disbursing Agencies would not be in a position to revise such cases. Hence, such cases shall be referred to the Pension Sanctioning Authorities by Pension Disbursing Agencies on enclosed Annexure to issue corrigendum PPOs in affected cases.

2. Similarly the DSC personnel who are receiving two pensions, one for regular Army Service and other for DSC Service, their pension for DSC Service shall not be revised. The pension for regular Army service shall be revised under these orders by the Pension Disbursing Agencies. A reference for revision of pension for DSC service will be sent to PCDA (P) on attached Annexure for issue of Corr. PPO. However, Pension of DSC pensioners receiving only one pension for DSC service shall be revised under these orders from attached Table of the Army personnel. DSC pensioners who were on clerical duty and other duty, their pension shall be revised by the attached table for group ‘Y’ and group ‘2’ respectively.

3. Maximum term of engagement for various ranks is mentioned in Appendix ‘X’ of this office important Circular No. 501 dated 17.01.2013. To maintain the uniformity in the tables, the rates have been shown up to the qualifying service of 28 years for each rank. The Service Pension may be revised only up to maximum term of engagement.

4. In Annexure ‘C’ for Navy attached with GOI, MOD letter dated 03.09.2015 circulated vide Circular No. 547, the Column Nos. have been typed erroneously as 2, 3, 5……, same may be treated as re-numbered from ‘1’ upward accordingly. Column No. 21 of Annexure ‘B’ (Air Force) of GOI, MOD letter dated 03.09.2015 circulated vide this office Circular No. 547 has erroneously been typed as ‘2021’, the same may be read as Column No. ‘21’ instead of ‘2021’. Further, in column 9 of Annexure ‘B’, the rate shown for the rank of CPL ‘Z’ against the qualifying service of 25.5 years has erroneously been typed as ‘Rs. 5151’, the same may be read as Rs. 4922 instead of Rs. 5151.

5. Similarly, equivalence of ranks across the three services has also been provided in Circular No. 501 dt- 17.01.2013 and Circular No. 512 dt- 26.06.2013. The rank of Chief Mechanician is equivalent to Chief Artificer. Therefore, the pension of Chief Mechanician shall be revised according to Chief Artificer. As per this office ibid circular, the rank of Mechanician IV is equivalent to Artificer IV. Therefore, the pension of Mechanician lV shall be revised equivalent to Artificer- IV.

6. Further, revision under these order may be done on the basis of rank last held and not for the rank for which pensioned as the same has already been clarified in Note below Annexure-Ill of Gol, MoD letter dated 11.11.2008 circulated vide this office Circular No. 397 dated 18.11.2008 (as amended from time to time).

7. All other terms and conditions shall remain unchanged.

8. This circular has been uploaded on this office website www.pcdapension.nic.in for dissemination across the all concerned.

(G.K. Baranwal)
Dy. CDA (Pensions)

Bunching benefit in Pay Band III Grade Pay 5400

By
igeadmin
-

Bunching benefit  in Pay Band III Grade Pay 5400

As per the 7th Pay Commission Report in page 80 para 5.1.36, it has clearly stated that rationalisation has been done with utmost care to ensure minimum bunching at most levels, however if situation does arise whenever more than two stages are bunched together, one additional increment equal to 3 percent may be given for every two stages bunched, and pay fixed in the subsequent cell in the pay matrix.

According to the above statement, we have prepared new bunching table. Here we have noticed many more bunching in Pay Band III Grade Pay 5400,

Example :
Basic Pay of Rs.15600,16230,16240,16250,16260,…16420 we can see 56100 in the calculation based on 2.57 fixation as per pay matrix. In this case we have to fix the Pay as below

Pay in the pay band Grade pay 6th cpc Basic pay Multiplication Factor Multiplied Result Rounded to nearest stage as per 7cpc fitment table 7th cpc New basic pay (Bunching adjusted)
15600 5400 21000 2.57 53970 56100 56100
16230 5400 21630 2.57 55589 56100 57800
16240 5400 21640 2.57 55615 56100 57800
16260 5400 21660 2.57 55666 56100 57800
16270 5400 21670 2.57 55692 56100 57800
16280 5400 21680 2.57 55718 56100 57800
16290 5400 21690 2.57 55743 56100 57800
16300 5400 21700 2.57 55769 56100 57800
16310 5400 21710 2.57 55795 56100 57800
16320 5400 21720 2.57 55820 56100 57800
16330 5400 21730 2.57 55846 56100 57800
16340 5400 21740 2.57 55872 56100 57800
16350 5400 21750 2.57 55898 56100 57800
16360 5400 21760 2.57 55923 56100 57800
16370 5400 21770 2.57 55949 56100 57800
16380 5400 21780 2.57 55975 56100 57800
16390 5400 21790 2.57 56000 56100 57800
16400 5400 21800 2.57 56026 56100 57800
16410 5400 21810 2.57 56052 56100 57800
16420 5400 21820 2.57 56077 56100 57800

Source : govtempdiary.com

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1800

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1900

Empanelment of private hospitals under CGHS Delhi & NCR

By
igeadmin
-

Empanelment of private hospitals under CGHS Delhi & NCR

No.S.11045/36/2012 -CGHS (HEC)
Government of India
Directorate General of Central Government Health Scheme
Department of Health & Family Welfare

Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi.
Dated the 23rd December, 2015.

OFFICE ORDER

Subject: Empanelment of private hospitals under CGHS Delhi & NCR

furtherance to Office Order dated 16.11.2015 empaneling certain Health Care Organizations (HCOs) under CGHS, the undersigned is directed to convey that in addition to the list of the hospitals (including dental clinics & eye centres) and diagnostic labortories already empanelled, following Health Care Organizations (HCOs) have also been empanelled under CGHS in Delhi & NCR with issuance of this order. The newly empanelled HCOs may be treated as included in the existing list of empanelled HCOs under CGHS with same terms and conditions as have been indicated in the office Memorandum dated 01.10.2014.

Sr.No Name of the HCOs Address & Tel.No NABH/Non-NABH Facilities Empanelled for
1 Rescue Hospital

Empanelled w.e.f. 23.12.2015

 S-5, Vishwas Park, Behind Sector – 3, petrol Pump, Dwarka, Delhi – 110059.Tel.No: 011 – 25335555, 39514240,25333399. Non- NABH General Medicine, General Surgery, Bone Marrow Transplant, Cardiology, Cardio thoracic Surgery, Gynecology, & Obstetheics Gastroenterology, Nephrology, Neurology, Neurosurgery, ENT, Eye, Dental, Orthopedic Surgery including joint replacement, Respiratory Medicine, Urology, and diagnostics.
2 Noble Diagnostic Centre

Empanelled w.e.f. 23.12.2015

 WZ-409C, Janak Park, Hari Nagar, Opp. Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Main Gate, New Delhi – 110066. Tel.No.011- 28122166, 28126230 NABL Accredited/Non-NABH Lab facilities and X-ray, Ultrasound, Colour Doppler

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1900

By
igeadmin
-

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1900

As per the 7th Pay Commission Report in page 80 para 5.1.36, it has clearly stated that rationalisation has been done with utmost care to ensure minimum bunching at most levels, however if situation does arise whenever more than two stages are bunched together, one additional increment equal to 3 percent may be given for every two stages bunched, and pay fixed in the subsequent cell in the pay matrix.

According to the above statement, we have prepared new bunching table. Here we have noticed 2 bunching in Pay Band I Grade Pay 1900,

Example :
For both Basic Pay of Rs. 8990 & Rs.9260 we can see 23800 in the calculation based on 2.57 fixation as per pay matrix. In this case we have to fix the Pay as below

Pay in the pay band Grade pay 6th cpc Basic pay Multiplication Factor Multiplied Result Rounded to nearest stage as per 7cpc fitment table 7th cpc New basic pay (Bunching adjusted)
7090 1900 8990 2.57 23104 23800 23800
7360 1900 9260 2.57 23798 23800 24500

We also updated the bunching benefit in the 7th Pay Commission Calculator for all the grade pay. Information (in Red) will be visible only if your basic pay comes under bunching

Bunching Message in the Calculator :Since your pay gets bunched with a lower stage, you get additional increment of 3 percent for every two stages bunched, and the pay is fixed based on the subsequent cell in the pay matrix

Source : Geod.in

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1800 – Click here

Fight for uniform multiplication of 14 times of the Grade pay

By
igeadmin
-

Fight for uniform multiplication of 14 times of the Grade pay

SHRI KHAJA SYED HAMEED HAS PREPARED A COMPARATIVE CHART ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF 7TH CPC WHEREIN INCREASE OF PAY HAS BEEN ANALYSISED ON THE BASIS OF EXISTING GRADE PAY. IN THIS METHOD ALSO GROUP C AND GROUP B EMPLOYEES FOUND SUFFERER. THE STATEMENT AS PREPARED BY HIM IS GIVEN BELOW:

VII th Pay Commission Injustice

Dear Sir,
I am bringing the following to your knowledge and information of Central Government Staff that VIIth Pay commission has done injustice to 98% of the Central Government Staff by just giving a multiplication factor of around 10 times their existing Grade Pay but generously awarded more than 14 times multiplication benefit to higher officials. So please fight for uniform multiplication of 14 times of the Grade pay and for each year of service one increment at the new scale as recommended to retired employees to give justice to all.

PB I      Rs 5200-20200

Grade Pay

 Minimum recommended @ entry level by 7th CPC (Rs) in the Pay Matrix Multiplication factor by VII th pay Commission
1800 18000  10 times
1900 19900 (difference +1900) 10.47
2000 21700(difference +1800) 10.85
2400 25500(difference +3700) 10.62
2800 29200(difference +3800) 10.42

Initially for first 2 stages every Rs100/ in GP the corresponding proposed increase is 1800 0r 1900 but for GP difference of Rs 400/ at later 2 stages the corresponding increase is only Rs3700/ to Rs3800/- whereas it must be Rs1800 0r 1900 multiplied by 4times to Rs7200-7600/.

PB II      Rs 9300-34800

Grade Pay

 Minimum recommended @ entry level by 7th CPC (Rs) in pay matrix Multiplication factor by VII th pay Commission
4200 35400(difference +6200) 8.42 times
4600 44900 (difference +9500) 9.76
4800 47600(difference +2700) 9.91
5400 53100(difference +5500) 9.83

Initially for Rs1400/- GP difference the corresponding increase proposed is Rs6200/- but in next stage for Rs400/-GP  the proposed hike is mind blowing Rs9500/-,in next stage for Rs200/-GP the increase is Rs2700/- and for Rs600/-GP hike further increase is Rs5500/-

PB III    Rs 15600-39100

Grade Pay

 Minimum recommended @ entry level by 7th CPC (Rs) in the Pay matrix Multiplication factor by VII th pay Commission
5400 56100  10.38times
6600 67700 (difference +11600) 10.25
7600 78800(difference +11100) 10.36
For a GP of Rs1200/- difference the hike proposed is Rs11600/- and for another Rs1000/- GP increase the increase given by CPC is Rs 11100/-

 

PB IV      Rs 37400-67000

Grade Pay

 Minimum recommended @ entry level by 7th CPC (Rs)in the Pay matrix Multiplication factor by VII th pay Commission
8700 118500(difference  +39700)  13.62 times
8900 131100 (difference +12600) 14.73
10000 144200(difference +13100) 14.42
For a GP increase of Rs1100/- the CPC proposed a hike of Rs39700/- and for a GP difference of Rs200/- the CPC recommended a increase of Rs12600/- and for a GP increase of Rs1100/- the CPC recommended a hike of Rs13100/-

It will easily understood the members of VII th Pay commission done fixation and recommendation quite irrationally without any uniformity in a whimsical manner. If 14 times multiplication is awarded to all the staff uniformly Min.Basic will be Rs1800* 14 = 25200/-for entry level staff. Kindly publish this in your website.

Kindly fight for justice.
Thanking you Sir,

Yours sincerely
Dr.Hameed

Source-http://aiamshq.blogspot.in/2015/12/shri-khaja-syed-hameed-has-prepared.html

Guidelines on Air Travel on Tour / LTC

By
igeadmin
-

Guidelines on Air Travel on Tour / LTC

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (HQ)
18, Institutional Area, SJS Marg
New Delhi – 110 016

F.No.1-1/2015/KVS (JC-Fin)

Date: 17.12.2015

The Deputy Commissioner & Director,
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan,
All Regional Offices & ZIETs.

Sub: Guidelines on Air Travel on Tour / LTC

Sir/Madam, During the audit on the accounts of Regional Offices and Kendriya Vidyalayas, the audit parties observed that the officers entitled for travel by Air have booked their Air Tickets through private travel agencies, which is not in order as per the extant orders and have also objected to it.

As per the Government of India guidelines, Air Tickets may be purchased directly from offices of the Air India ( at Booking counters/website of Airlines) or by utilizing the services of Authorized Travel Agencies namely M/s Balmer Lawrie & Company, M/s Ashok Travels & Tours and IRCTC (to the extent IRCTC is authorized as per DoPT’s OM No.311011/6/2002-Estt.(A) dated 02.12.2009).

The same procedure should be following for booking the Air Tickets for performing the Leave Travel Concession travel facility.

The copies of the following orders are enclosed herewith:

1. Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of personnel and Training) OM.No.311011/6/2002 – (Estt.(A) dated 2nd December 2009. [Click to view the orders]

2. Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure office Memorandum No.19024/1/2009-E.IV dated 16th September, 2010. [Click to view the orders]

3. Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, Office Memorandum No.19024/1/2012/E.IV dated 9th July 2013. [Click to view the orders]

4. Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, public Grievances and pensions (Department of personnel and Training) OM.No.311011/5/2014-(Estt.(A-IV) dated 23rd September 2015 [Click to view the orders]

In this connection, Deputy Commissioner, Regional Offices and Director, ZIETs are requested to inform their subordinate offices for strict compliance of the above orders.

Yours faithfully,

(M.Arumugam)
Jt. commissioner (Finance)

Original Copy

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1800

By
igeadmin
-

Bunching benefit in Pay Band 1 Grade Pay 1800

As per the 7th Pay Commission Report in page 80 para 5.1.36, it has clearly stated that rationalisation has been done with utmost care to ensure minimum bunching at most levels, however if situation does arise whenever more than two stages are bunched together, one additional increment equal to 3 percent may be given for every two stages bunched, and pay fixed in the subsequent cell in the pay matrix.

According to the above statement, we have prepared new bunching table. Here we have noticed 2 bunching in Pay Band I –  Grade Pay 1800,

Example :
For both Basic Pay of Rs. 7210 & Rs.7430 we can see 19100 in the calculation based on 2.57 fixation as per pay matrix. In this case we have to fix the Pay as below

Pay in the pay band Grade pay 6th cpc Basic pay Multiplication Factor Multiplied Result Rounded to nearest stage as per 7cpc fitment table 7th CPC New basic pay (Bunching adjusted)
5410 1800 7210 2.57 18530 19100 19100
5630 1800 7430 2.57 19095 19100 19700

Source : Govtempdiary.com

7th Pay Commission – Delay salary hikes, five states tell Centre

By
igeadmin
-

7th Pay Commission – Delay salary hikes, five states tell Centre

AT LEAST five fiscally-stressed states have asked the Centre to go slow on implementation of the Seventh Pay Commission’s recommendations, seeking extra time to be able to absorb similar pay hikes, government officials said.

States usually follow the Central Pay Commission’s recommendations, and, with some modifications, announce roughly similar salary hikes for state government employees.

“There are several states who have approached the Prime Minister’s Office, Cabinet Secretary and Niti Aayog, seeking more time in implementation of the Seventh Pay Commission’s report,” said a government official familiar with the matter.

The five states are West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Odisha. The suggested delay will give the states more time to equip themselves with resources to meet higher salary bills.

The Seventh Pay Commission, headed by Justice A K Mathur, submitted its report to the government last month, recommending 23.55 per cent overall hike in pay, allowances and pensions of government employees with effect from January 1, 2016. This means the Centre’s salary bill will increase by Rs 1,02,100 crore in 2016-17.

“Punjab’s finances are under stress and the burden of the Pay Commission’s recommendations will certainly have an impact… Our officials have informally taken up the matter with the Centre,” confirmed Punjab Finance Minister P S Dhindsa.

“Normally they (states) adopt the Centre’s recommendations. This is the normal procedure, but it certainly depends upon their (states’) financial health. Some of the states have not even implemented the Sixth Pay Commission’s recommendation,” Justice Mathur says.

“Some of the states may have suggested (delayed implementation) to the government, but I don’t think the Government of India is in a bad position,” he said.

When contacted, Odisha’s Additional Chief Secretary (Finance Department), R Balakrishnan said: “At this stage, we don’t want to comment on it.”

Despite repeated calls and emails, West Bengal Finance Minister Amit Mitra’s office did not comment on the report. In September, the West Bengal government set up its Pay Commission to suggest a salary revision plan. The state commission is expected to follow on the Seventh Pay Commission’s recommendations.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Secretary Alok Ranjan said the state was yet to assess the fiscal implication of the Seventh Pay Commission’s recommendations. The Indian Express could not reach the Tamil Nadu government.

While salary revisions are due in these five states, the states which follow a different wage revision cycle, such as Andhra Pradesh, will not be impacted by the Seventh Pay Commission’s report.

Andhra Pradesh Principal Secretary, Dr P V Ramesh, said the state had revised salaries with effect from April 1, 2015, and the next revision is due only in 2019. “We follow a five-year pay revision cycle, which is not linked with the central cycle. The Seventh Pay Commission, therefore, will not have an impact on us,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Union finance ministry has set up an implementation cell for processing and implementing accepted recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission.

Source : The Indian Express

Important Fixation Factor in 7th CPC Basic Pay

By
igeadmin
-

Important Fixation Factor in 7th CPC Basic Pay

After the release of 7th CPC Report, all central government employees have calculated the revise pay using the Pay fixation method and using online calculators. However, there are quite a few basic pays values which need to be calculate differently for the exact revised pay as per 7th CPC Recommendation.

Given below are the examples which illustrates why this kind of calculation is important for the exact 7th CPC revised value.

Example: Employee “A” drawing Basic Pay – 21000 (PB III+GP 5400)

Basic Pay ( PB III + GP 5400) 21000.00
As per 7th CPC (multiplied by 2.57) 53970.00
As per 7th CPC Matrix Table 56100.00

Above calculation is the right method to derive the new value as per 7th CPC Recommendation.

Consider another employee “B” who is drawing the below figures

Example: Employee “A” drawing Basic Pay – 21000 (PB III+GP 5400)

Basic Pay ( PB III + GP 5400) 21630.00
As per 7th CPC (multiplied by 2.57) 55589.00
As per 7th CPC Matrix Table 56100.00   X

Employee would have assumed that the revised pay would be 56100/-, however this is WRONG because the revised pay is bunched in two stage.

If you look at both the examples, there is a different in drawn pay and the revised pay as per 7th CPC is the same, which is not right for the employee “B” and a loss for this employee. To overcome this 7th CPC has recommend to do two stage bunching which means employee “B” should be given 3% additional increment and pay fixed in the subsequent cell in the pay matrix.

i.e. Since employee “B” revised value fall under bunching, the revised proposed salary revision would be as follow.

Basic Pay ( PB III + GP 5400) 21630.00
As per 7th CPC (multiplied by 2.57) 55589.00
As per 7th CPC Matrix Table 56100.00
7th CPC Clause – Second Cell 57800.00

Hope this article gives you more insight about the bunching value with one example

Source : Govtempdiary.com

Rounding off of a fraction of a rupee in regulation of additional pension

By
igeadmin
-

Rounding off of a fraction of a rupee in regulation of additional pension

No.1(6)/2015/D(Pen/Pol)
Government of India
Ministry of Defence
Department of Ex-Servicemen Welfare

New Delhi, Dated 23 December, 2015

To

The Chief of Army Staff
The Chief of Naval Staff
The Chief of Air Force Staff

Sub: – Rounding off of a fraction of a rupee in regulation of additional pension.

Sir,

The undersigned is directed to say that vide this Department’s letter No.17(4)/2008(1 )/D(Pen/Pol) dated 11.11.2008 and letter No. 17(4)/2008(2)/D (Pen/Pol) dated 12.11.2008, instructions were issued for grant of additional pension/family pension @ 20% to 100% to old pensioners/family pensioners of the age of 80 years and above.

2. A question has been raised as to how the amount of additional pension is to be regulated in cases the additional pension results in fraction of a rupee. The matter has been examined in consultation with Ministry of Finance (Department of Expenditure) and Deptt of Pension & Pensioners Welfare and it has been decided that the amount of additional pension as finally calculated, may be rounded off to the next higher rupee. In cases the pension/family pension of’ old pensioners has been fixed/revised without rounding off the additional pension, in those cases also, the additional pension may be rounded off in the next higher rupee hereinafter. However, no arrears for the period from 1.1.2006 on account of such rounding off would be paid in those cases.

3. This issues with the concurrence of. Ministry of Defence(FinNo.1(6)/2015/D(Pen/Pol) /Pen) vide their ID No. 25(06)/2015/Fin/Pen dated 07.12.2015.

4. Hindi version will follow.

Yours faithfully,

(Manoj Sinha)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Original Copy

1...735736737...912Page 736 of 912

Just In

About us

IGECORNER is a trusted online platform dedicated to empowering Central Government Employees with up-to-date information, valuable resources, government orders, latest news and insightful discussions.

Follow us

© Copyright 2010–2025 All Rights Reserved | igecorner.com