Revision of pension under ‘One Rank One Pension’ – PCDA Circular 566
OFFICE OF THE PR. CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (PENSIONS)
DRAUPADI CHAT, ALLAHABAD- 211014
REGISTERED
Circular No. 566
Dated: 16.09.2016
Subject :- Revision of pension under ‘One Rank One Pension’.
Ref :- This office Circular No. 555 dated 04.02.2016 & Circular No. 557 dated 17.03.2016.
*********
Pension Disbursing Agencies (PDAS) are aware that as per this Office Circular NO. 555 dt. 04.02.2016, pension of Armed Forces Personnel is to be revised w.e.f. 01.07.2014 by the PDAS as per tables attached with this Circular. PDAS have reported some difficulties on certain points while implementing the scheme Of ‘OROP’. Clarification in the matter is as under:-
(i) Revision of pension in respect of Post-2006 Havildars granted ACP-I who later on promoted to the Rank of Hony Nb Sub :- It is Clarified that pension of Post-2006 Havildars granted ACP-I, who got pensionary benefits of Nb-Sub rank but later on promoted to the rank of Hony. Nb-Sub for which Corr. PPOS were issued revising the rank as Hony. Nb-Sub. Pension in such cases Shall be revised to the rank of Nb-Sub.
(ii) Revision of pension under OROP in r/o Fly. Sergeant: – The rank of Fly. Sergeant has not been mentioned in the equivalence of ranks in Appendix – ‘Y’ of this Office above mentioned Circulars. It iS hereby Clarified that rank of Fly. Sergeant iS equivalent to JWO of the Air Force and Naib Subedar of the Army. Hence, pension of Fly. Sergeant Shall be revised from the Tables of Naib Subedar
2. All other terms and conditions in the matter shall remain unchanged.
3. This circular has been uploaded on this office website www.pcdapension.nic.in for dissemination
across the all concerned.
No. Gts/Tech/0167/XXIV
Dated: 16.09.2016
(C.B. Yadav)
DCDA (Pensions)
How about writing to the Committee that is studying the feasibility of implementing the fixation of Pay/Pension as per the 7th CPC Matrix option,drawing attention as to how it was already done for implementing modified parity etc., as per the 5th CPC recommendations.
If feasibility alone is the impediment,how about demanding ; OK,let the Gross Pension( i.e.including DA/DR as on 1.1.16) be just multiplied by 2.
Is not the same thing done many times,by a mere Voice Vote,when the Remuneration of Legislators is to be enhanced?
Let the Govt.question itself,as to how moral it is?
The govt. always raises the bogey of total expenditure to the Exchequer;but what really matters is ” Per- Capita “,just like the total wealth of a Nation is not as important as the ‘Wealth-per-Capita”.
Let the stalwarts of the country decide as to what financial relativities we should have among various sections of our society: What calibre,what talent should be paid for how much?etc.,.
If votes in elections alone is the criterion to our Political parties,may be all Employees and Pensioners………..stretching to the whole Working Class,we may have to form into a distinct Voting Bloc.